My response to You Are Not A Blog
Steven Streight, aka Vaspers the Grate, is a talented and literate person who writes a consistently thought-provoking weblog.
Unfortunately, he seems to be of the mindset that the originators of the internet, blogging, whatever, have some say over how blogging "should be done". If you read my posts about yesterday's experts, you can imagine my immediate response to his post "You are not a blog."
I left this response on his site, but in the event you might not fall across it, I am repeating it here:
Steven, you make three telling statements that beautifully illustrate the viewpoints of those who initiate paradigm shifts and are overwhelmed by the newcomers who take their precious artifacts and use them for purposes that the designers never considered.
These were your statements:
In the beginning, the blog was impersonal, cold, dry, unemotional. And this was good.
To be successful, a blog has to stick pretty closely with the original purpose.
It's very sad and strange to see a research tool (the blog) deteriorate into a self-disclosure confessional platform.
My response is simple. A blog is a platform for citizen publishing, it is no longer a notepad for some dry list of useful links. Get over the idea that you or any of the fine people who contributed to the internet and blogging have any control over what people are creating with the tool you may have contributed to.
The fact that millions of people practice unmoderated psychotherapy on one another is no real concern of yours. They are probably doing less harm to themselves than if they were downing the addictive anti-depressants that are so freely prescribed everyday.
Blogging is an art form, a profession, and is begining to be a vehicle for a new wave of creativity that will blow us away.
I've taken the time to sample some LiveJournal stuff and there is a power in those barely readable posts which which bears watching.
When a 14 year-old writes a post about her politically compromised teacher and the blogging world responds with telling effect, we are not looking at illiterate scribblers. Sure, they suffer from the ill effects of a degenerate educational system, but they are communicating in a way that never existed before and they will overcome their lack of grammar and spelling to become powerful new voices in the blogosphere.
Blogging is a paradigm shift of enormous proportions. We agree upon that. To hope that it sticks close to its research lab roots is the final fantasy. The communication tsunami has been unleashed. People are talking to new friends all around the planet about things we can't even conceive.
Don't go the way of MSM and Ozymandias. Don't try to stop or channel this new torrent. Grab your blog and paddle fiercely to catch the next wave.
The future is being blogged as you read this..a billion voices will write tomorrow's history instead of the well-connected few of the past.
Embrace the future. Don't become yesterday's expert.
For an entirely different viewpoint, one that I embrace wholeheartedly, see this excerpt from Rebecca Blood:
I strongly believe in the power of weblogs to transform both writers and readers from "audience" to "public" and from "consumer" to "creator." Weblogs are no panacea for the crippling effects of a media-saturated culture, but I believe they are one antidote.
[Rebecca's Pocket, "Weblogs: a History and Perspective", 7 September 2000]
Tag: citizen publishing





Good post. :-)
It reminds me of the recent flurry about Jeremy http://www.ensight.org/archives/2005/03/17/the-end-of-the-story/
being rejected entry into the USA - strip searched and held for questioning even - because he stated his occupation as "blogger".
Whatever the inventors of blogging intended it to be, it has and continues to grow far beyond anything anyone could have predicted.
Posted by: Carrie | Mar 21, 2005 at 08:28 PM
Maybe the 'old line' bloggers are right... We could roll back the printing press to only print bibles... Ahh for the good old days!
Posted by: Stuart Berman | Mar 21, 2005 at 11:34 PM
Excellent post. Now if we could just do away with digital cameras.
Posted by: fletch | Mar 22, 2005 at 09:27 AM
Good post! As someone recently drawn to blogging, I appreciate the free form and lack of structure. The audience finds you. If they find you and stay, great! If the don't stay hopefully others do!
I like your style.
Posted by: Michele | Mar 22, 2005 at 12:33 PM
Hallelujah, Brother! Well said.
It's a little like being a parent, really (... she says, the mother of an 18-year-old) ... at some point, you have to let go of your own ideas and hopes about what your child could or should be, and let them go on to become their own person. They just might turn out even better than you imagined.
Posted by: maria | Mar 22, 2005 at 01:25 PM
Testify, Brother David!
My 80-year-old parents print out my blog entries, get out the magnifiers and read the whole thing at the kitchen table. It's like they get a letter from me every day. Another unforeseen use of blogs.
Posted by: Tom McMahon | Mar 22, 2005 at 08:29 PM
Amen, Brothers and Sisters!
Thanks for your comments.
See next post for the continuing story.
Posted by: David St Lawrence | Mar 22, 2005 at 10:15 PM
Not to diminish the Hallelujah chorus, or the Amen corner, by even one jot or tittle, but my point was that personal blogs that ramble on narcissistically, relentlessly bloating the blogosphere with trivial, mundane details, may appeal to mom or grandma, but they seem futile to me.
Self-obsessed random musings never have worked in any medium.
Only, perhaps in teenage telephone or chat room conversations, but even then, the other users will tire of it quickly. If you have nothing important to say, your audience will notice and may be annoyed.
A lady who attacked my "You Are Not A Blog" gradually saw what I meant when a freind visited her and her boyfriend. The visitor rambled on breathlessly about his this and his that, then departed, never once inquiring about her boyfriend's new book or published articles. They decided to not invite that person over very often from now on.
Personal details in a blog can make a business blog seem unprofessional, less pragmatic, lower in value for information.
Personal blogging that blurts out identifiable details of children, family, local hangouts, employers, co-workers, etc. can prove dangerous. There are stories of child predators, stalkers, con artists, identity theft criminals, plus irate employers and co-workers.
Don't rush into vast amounts of self-revelation in either personal or business blogs, if you want to be wise and safe.
See my post on "Dangers of Personal Blogging" for substantiating information which may enlighten.
There is a way to incorporate personal details in private or business blogs. But you need to discover the best practices and the potential pitfalls.
Posted by: Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate | Mar 26, 2005 at 07:09 PM